Estimated reading time: 14 minutes
You are not a person having a spiritual experience. You are the universe, briefly pretending to be a person. That’s the seed for the concept of ‘infinite you.’
Every morning you wake up and you assume the same thing, that you are a bounded self. Meaning – A body with a name, a history, a nervous system that ends at the skin. You eat breakfast as you. You check your phone as you and you worry, plan, love, and suffer as you.
If you mull over it, this assumption is really deep, so automatic, that questioning it feels absurd.
But here is what modern physics and ancient Vedic wisdom both, independently, insist – this “you” is a fiction. Not a metaphor for humility but a demonstrable, measurable, scientifically testable fiction.
You are not a thing inside the universe. You are the universe, temporarily localised.
That is the concept of the Infinite You. And it is not a thought. It is not a spiritual aspiration. It is the most accurate description of what you actually are.
Why the universe hid this from you
The question worth asking first is: if this is true, why doesn’t it feel true?
Evolution did not select for accurate perception of reality. It selected for survival. A brain that experiences itself as sharply separate from its environment, from predators, from rivals, from cliffs, survives better than one that blissfully perceives its oneness with everything.
Your sense of being a bounded individual is a biological convenience, not an ontological truth.
The neuroscientist Anil Seth, in his work on predictive processing, calls what we experience “a controlled hallucination.” The brain is not a passive receiver of reality. It is a prediction machine, constantly constructing a model of the world, including a model of the self and projecting it outward. You experience that projection, not the underlying reality.
“The self is a perception, not a thing.” – Anil Seth, Being You (2021)
The Vedic tradition arrived at this same conclusion roughly 3,000 years earlier.
What Vedanta actually says
The Upanishads are careful, rigorous philosophical inquiry into the nature of consciousness and existence. Their central claim is clear and explicit:
Mahavakya 1 – The Great Saying of Identity
अहं ब्रह्मास्मि Aham Brahmāsmi – Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, 1.4.10
“I am Brahman.” Not “I am connected to Brahman.” Not “I aspire toward Brahman.” I am the infinite ground of existence. The individual self (Atman) and the universal consciousness (Brahman) are identical.
This is a statement about the structure of reality.
Mahavakya 2 – The Indestructibility of Consciousness
तत् त्वम् असि Tat Tvam Asi – Chandogya Upanishad
“That thou art.” The Sage Uddalaka says this to his son Shvetaketu, pointing at the invisible essence of a tree, of salt dissolved in water, of everything that exists and says: you are that. The infinite, formless, imperishable essence of all things is what you are.
Mahavakya 3 – The Nature of Consciousness Itself
प्रज्ञानं ब्रह्म Prajñānam Brahma – Aitareya Upanishad
“Consciousness is Brahman.” Not a product of matter. Not a side effect of neurons. Consciousness is the foundational substance. Everything else – matter, energy, space, time – arises within it.
This places consciousness not inside the universe, but as the ground from which the universe emerges. This is the central thesis of Advaita Vedanta as systematised by Adi Shankaracharya in the 8th century CE.
Mahavakya 4 – The Whole is the Self
अयमात्मा ब्रह्म Ayam Ātmā Brahma – Mandukya Upanishad
“This Self is Brahman.” The Mandukya Upanishad, the shortest and perhaps the most precise of all Upanishads, makes this declaration across just twelve verses. The Self you experience in your most awake, most aware moments – stripped of all stories, all histories, all identities – that awareness itself is the infinite.
On the illusion of separateness
नेह नानास्ति किंचन Neha nānāsti kiṃcana
“There is no multiplicity here whatsoever.” The apparent world of separate, individual things is an appearance. The underlying reality is non-dual – one without a second.
On the nature of Atman
अयं आत्मा अजः नित्यः शाश्वतः पुराणः Ayam ātmā ajaḥ nityaḥ śāśvataḥ purāṇaḥ
“This Self is unborn, eternal, changeless, and primeval.” What you are, at your deepest layer, was never born and will never die. It does not change. Time does not touch it.
From the Bhagavad Gita – on the indestructibility of the Self
न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचित् नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूयः। अजो नित्यः शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे॥ Na jāyate mriyate vā kadācit nāyaṃ bhūtvā bhavitā vā na bhūyaḥ। Ajo nityaḥ śāśvato’yaaṃ purāṇo na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre॥ – Bhagavad Gita, 2.20
“It is never born, nor does it die. It has not come into being, does not come into being, and will not come into being. And it is unborn, eternal, ever-existing, and primeval. It is not slain when the body is slain.”
This is the description of the physics of consciousness as understood in the Vedic framework.
Now the science
What makes the “Infinite You” concept remarkable is not that ancient sages believed it. It’s that modern physics keeps arriving at compatible conclusions from entirely different starting points.
In 1964, physicist John Stewart Bell derived a set of mathematical inequalities that, when tested, would determine whether nature is truly local, whether particles only affect things nearby, or whether distant parts of the universe are somehow connected.
In a landmark 2015 experiment at Delft University (Hensen et al., Nature 526, 682–686), Bell’s inequalities were violated under “loophole-free” conditions. This result, replicated in 2022 across three independent experimental groups (which won the Nobel Prize in Physics), confirmed what was theoretically suspected:
The universe is non-local. Entangled particles, regardless of the distance separating them, behave as a single system. There is no mechanism, no signal, no explanation within classical physics. They are simply not separate.
If this is true at the quantum level, and it is, experimentally, then the apparent separateness of things is a large-scale approximation, not a fundamental truth.
The Upanishads called this Advaita. One without a second.
The observer effect – consciousness participates in reality
In the famous double-slit experiment, a particle fired through two slits behaves as a wave until it is observed, at which point it collapses into a definite location. The act of measurement changes the outcome.
This is an experimentally repeatable result.
What it means is deeply unsettling for materialism: the observer cannot be cleanly separated from what is observed.
Physicist John Wheeler took this further with his “participatory universe” hypothesis, that the universe cannot even be said to exist in a definite sense without observers to actualise it. In his words:
“We are participants in bringing into being not only the near and here but the far away and long ago.” – John Wheeler, At Home in the Universe (1994)
Vedanta’s Prajñānam Brahma – “Consciousness is Brahman” – says exactly this: consciousness is not produced by the universe. Consciousness is the precondition for the universe to appear at all.
The hard problem of consciousness where matter cannot explain awareness
In 1995, philosopher David Chalmers articulated what he called the “hard problem of consciousness.” Science can explain how the brain processes information, responds to stimuli, integrates sensory data. What it cannot explain is why there is subjective experience at all, why there is something it is like to be you.
No neural correlate, no matter how detailed, explains the fact of experience itself. This explanatory gap has not closed in thirty years of neuroscience.
If consciousness were merely a product of matter, there would be no hard problem. The fact that the hard problem exists suggests that consciousness may be fundamental and not derived from matter, but prior to it.
This is precisely the position of Advaita Vedanta, Kashmiri Shaivism, and the philosophy of Abhinavagupta (10th century CE), who described consciousness (Chit) as the ground of all existence.
The binding problem: your unified experience defies neural architecture
Your brain processes vision in one area, sound in another, touch in another, memory in another. These are spatially distributed, processed in parallel, handled by different neural circuits.
Yet you experience a single, unified, coherent moment of awareness. How?
This is the binding problem, and neuroscience has not solved it. There is no “master neuron,” no central theatre where it all comes together. The unification of experience happens, but the mechanism is unknown.
One serious theoretical proposal – Integrated Information Theory (IIT) by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi – proposes that consciousness is identical to a certain kind of information integration, denoted as Φ (phi). The more integrated a system’s information, the more conscious it is.
A corollary of IIT: consciousness is not an exclusive feature of brains. Any sufficiently integrated system has some degree of it. This is structurally similar to the Vedic view that consciousness (Chit) pervades all of existence.
The holographic principle
In physics, the holographic principle (proposed by Gerard ‘t Hooft and expanded by Juan Maldacena) suggests that the information of a volume of space can be fully encoded on its boundary surface. A three-dimensional reality may be, in some sense, a projection from a lower-dimensional informational surface.
This is being tested in the context of black hole physics and quantum gravity. Its full implications are still being worked out.
But the structural resonance with the Vedic concept of Maya – the idea that the manifested world (Prakriti) is an appearance arising from an underlying, formless reality (Brahman) is striking. The “real” thing is not the apparent three-dimensional world. The apparent world is a projection of something more fundamental.
Cosmological entanglement – the Big Bang makes us one
Here is something rarely stated plainly: everything in the observable universe was once compressed into an extraordinarily small region, smaller than an atom, at the moment of the Big Bang.
At that moment, every particle that would eventually become stars, planets, and human beings was in contact. Quantum mechanically, they were entangled.
That entanglement does not simply disappear as the universe expands. It becomes diluted, averaged out, hard to detect, but it does not vanish. In principle, everything in the universe shares a quantum mechanical history that traces back to total unity.
You are not like the universe. You are made of the universe. And you are part of an unbroken quantum-mechanical whole that has never truly separated.
What enlightenment actually is
“Enlightenment” has been romanticised into something alluring – blinding light, perpetual bliss, a state reserved for mountain-dwelling sages.
The actual Vedantic description is more precise and less theatrical.
Moksha is not the acquisition of a new state. It is the recognition of what was always the case. It is the dropping of the misidentification. The cloud clears; the sun that was always there is simply seen again.
Physicist Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, was deeply influenced by Vedanta. He wrote:
“The total number of minds in the universe is one.” – Erwin Schrödinger, What Is Life? (1944)
Nikola Tesla similarly explored Vedic concepts. His biographers note his study of Vivekananda’s lectures on Vedanta, and he reportedly said:
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.”
The practical consequence
The anxiety that consumes you is the anxiety of a limited self defending a boundary that doesn’t really exist. The fear of death is the fear of a self that was never born in the first place. The loneliness is the loneliness of something that was never actually separate.
This doesn’t dissolve difficulty. It doesn’t make pain disappear. But it fundamentally reframes who is experiencing the difficulty.
The Mandukya Upanishad describes four states of consciousness – waking (Jagrat), dreaming (Svapna), deep sleep (Sushupti), and the fourth (Turiya). The first three are states. The fourth is not a state. It is the awareness that witnesses all three states. It is the infinite, unchanging, ever-present background.
You are not in Turiya the way you might be “in” a mood. You are Turiya. The other states appear and disappear within you.
ॐ पूर्णमदः पूर्णमिदं पूर्णात्पूर्णमुदच्यते। पूर्णस्य पूर्णमादाय पूर्णमेवावशिष्यते॥ Om Pūrṇamadaḥ pūrṇamidaṃ pūrṇātpūrṇamudacyate। Pūrṇasya pūrṇamādāya pūrṇamevāvaśiṣyate॥ — Isha Upanishad, Invocation
“That is whole. This is whole. From wholeness, wholeness arises. Even after taking wholeness from wholeness, wholeness remains.”
Infinity minus infinity is still infinity. You cannot diminish the infinite. You cannot diminish what you are.
Summary
| Domain | What it found |
|---|---|
| Quantum mechanics (Bell, 1964–2022) | Universe is fundamentally non-local; separation is approximate |
| Observer effect (Bohr, Wheeler) | Consciousness participates in actualising reality |
| Hard problem of consciousness (Chalmers, 1995) | Awareness cannot be derived from matter |
| Integrated Information Theory (Tononi) | Consciousness may be a fundamental property, not an emergent one |
| Holographic principle (Maldacena) | Apparent reality may be a projection from deeper information |
| Advaita Vedanta (Shankaracharya, 8th c. CE) | Atman = Brahman; individual self = infinite consciousness |
| Upanishads (1500–800 BCE) | Consciousness is the ground of being, not a product of it |
Frequently Asked Questions
It means your true self is not the body or the mind. It is the awareness behind all experience, boundless, unborn, and identical to the consciousness that underlies the entire universe.
Yes, within specific limits. The 2022 Nobel Prize-winning Bell test experiments confirmed that the universe is non-local – entangled particles behave as a single system regardless of distance.
Atman is the individual self, the awareness you experience as “I.” Brahman is the infinite, formless ground of all existence. Advaita Vedanta’s central claim is that they are identical.
Because the brain evolved for survival, not truth. It constructs a model of a bounded self because that model is useful, not because it is accurate. The Vedantic tradition calls this Avidya, or primal ignorance. The infinite is always present. It is simply overlooked.
No. In Advaita Vedanta, Moksha is not the creation of something new. It is the removal of a misidentification. The infinite was never absent. Realisation is simply seeing what was always true, like noticing the screen that was always behind every film you ever watched.
Final thoughts
The ‘Infinite You’ is a reality to recognise.
Physics tells you the boundary between you and the universe is statistical, not absolute. Vedanta tells you the boundary was always an appearance. The hard problem of consciousness tells you awareness cannot be reduced to matter. The observer effect tells you awareness shapes matter.
Everything points to the same place.
You were never small. You were just looking through a very small window, and mistaking the window for the whole sky.
The sky was always there. It still is.
References
- Hensen, B. et al. (2015). “Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.” Nature, 526, 682–686.
- Aspect, A., Clauser, J. F., & Zeilinger, A. (2022). Nobel Prize in Physics — for experiments on entangled photons, establishing violations of Bell inequalities.
- Seth, A. (2021). Being You: A New Science of Consciousness. Dutton.
- Chalmers, D. (1995). “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
- Tononi, G. (2004). “An Information Integration Theory of Consciousness.” BMC Neuroscience, 5, 42.
- Wheeler, J. A. (1994). At Home in the Universe. AIP Press.
- Schrödinger, E. (1944). What Is Life? Cambridge University Press.
- Shankaracharya, A. (8th c. CE). Vivekachudamani (trans. various).
- Maldacena, J. (1997). “The Large N Limit of Superstring Field Theories and Supergravity.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 1113–1133.
- Upanishads: Brihadaranyaka, Chandogya, Katha, Mandukya, Aitareya, Isha (trans. Swami Gambhirananda, Advaita Ashrama).
- Bhagavad Gita (trans. A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada; also Swami Nikhilananda).
Hoomale offers blogs on business, youth mindset, future work, and tech. Stay informed and educated with our captivating reads.
Get notified of our next post via email by signing up with the form below! Follow us on YouTube.
Get your free subscription to Hoomale Newsletter now.
Our fav tools: Coolors, InVideo, Semrush, WordPress, Dreamstime, Epidemic Sound
Disclaimer: Some posts have affiliate links. If you buy through them, we earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend trusted, high-quality products. Thanks for your support!
